A grandfather clock is a strange machine. It is driven by a falling weight, which supplies energy at whatever rate it pleases, and yet the hands move at a rate you can set your life by. The thing that makes it honest is a swinging rod. Give that rod a bigger shove and it swings wider, but it still comes back at the same moment it would have anyway. The push changes the size of the motion and not its timing.
You met that behaviour in the previous lesson: whenever the restoring force is proportional to the displacement, the motion is simple harmonic, the period is , and the amplitude drops out. A pendulum has no spring in it. Nothing about a bob on a string looks like . This lesson is about why it behaves as if it did, exactly how far that pretence can be pushed, and what to do when the swinging object is a rod, a disk, or a meter stick with a pin through it.
Where the period comes from
Hang a small bob of mass on a light string of length . Pull it aside so the string makes an angle with the vertical, and look at what gravity is doing.
Two forces act on the bob: the tension along the string, and the weight straight down. The tension points exactly at the pivot, so it can never speed the bob up or slow it down along its arc: it only keeps the bob on the circle. Split the weight into a piece along the string and a piece perpendicular to it. The along-string piece is , and the tension deals with that. The perpendicular piece is
and that is the only force that drives the swing. The minus sign says it points back toward the bottom: swing right, and it pushes left.
Now write Newton's second law along the arc. The bob's distance along the arc from the bottom is , so its acceleration along the arc is , where the dots mean derivatives with respect to time. Then
That is the trouble. Simple harmonic motion needs acceleration proportional to displacement, and is not proportional to . But for small angles it very nearly is. In radians, . The sine of a small angle and the angle itself agree to better than a part in a thousand. Replace by and the equation becomes
which is exactly the shape from last lesson, with . So
Worked example 1. A brass bob hangs from a string of length and swings through a small angle. Take .
Run it backwards to design a clock. If you want exactly, square the formula: , so . That gives . A pendulum just under a metre long ticks once per second, which is why so many clock cases are the height they are.
The approximation is only true in radians, because it comes from the series , which is written in radians. A calculator in degree mode gives , nothing like . Convert with before you use any small-angle result.
What is missing from the formula
Look at and notice what is not in it.
The mass is gone. It cancelled in the very first line, because gravity supplies both the restoring force (proportional to ) and the inertia that resists it (also proportional to ). A lead bob and a cork bob on equal strings keep the same time.
The amplitude is gone too. That is the whole content of the small-angle step. Double the swing and you double the restoring torque, so the bob covers twice the distance at twice the speed and arrives at the same instant.
Both facts make the period a slow function of , since . To double the period you need four times the length, not twice.
Quick check
A pendulum has a period of 1.55 s. Its string is replaced by one twice as long, and nothing else changes. What is the new period?
The same makes the pendulum a good instrument. Time one and you have measured . Rearranged, . A student times a pendulum at and gets
Small changes are worth handling with the squared form rather than the square root, because it avoids a difference of two nearly equal square roots. A clock pendulum meant to have runs slow at . How much shorter should it be? Since ,
about . A clock's timing screw moves the bob by that sort of amount, which is why it is a screw and not a slider.
When the swing is too big
The amplitude only vanishes because you threw away the difference between and . Since is a little less than , a wide swing is restored slightly too weakly, and a real pendulum released far from the bottom runs slow. Solving the exact equation gives a correction series in the release angle , in radians:
Worked example 2. A pendulum is released from rest at , with .
First convert: . Then and .
From example 1, . So
A swing runs about percent slow. At the correction is percent; at it is near percent. "Small angle" is not a formality, it is a numerical claim, and you should be willing to check it.
Do not carry into a problem about a swinging rod, hoop, or meter stick, with the object's total length plugged in as . That formula assumes every gram of mass sits at distance from the pivot. In a rod, most of the mass sits closer in, so the rod swings faster than a string of the same length. Use the physical pendulum formula below instead.
Any rigid body can be a pendulum
Take any rigid object, pin it at a point that is not its center of mass, and let it hang. Call its total mass, the distance from the pivot to the center of mass, and its moment of inertia about the pivot axis.
Gravity acts at the center of mass, so the restoring torque about the pivot is , with measured from the hanging position. Rotational Newton's second law says , so
Same shape again. So , and
Check it against the simple pendulum: a point bob at distance has and , giving , as it must.
Almost always you will need the parallel axis theorem to get about the pivot: , where is about a parallel axis through the center of mass. For a uniform rod, ; for a uniform disk in its own plane, ; for a solid sphere, .
Worked example 3. A uniform meter stick swings on a pin through its mark. Find the period.
Write down the three things the formula wants. The center of mass of a uniform stick is at the mark, so . The mass is unknown, but it will cancel, so carry it as a symbol. The moment of inertia about the pin is
Then
The mass cancelling is not luck. It cancels whenever gravity is the only thing driving the swing, because is proportional to too.
This also handles a "simple" pendulum whose bob is not really a point. A sphere of radius hung with its center below the pivot has and . That gives , against for a true point bob. The finite size matters at the fourth digit here, but the same correction on a fat bob and a short string matters much sooner.
One more member of the family. Hang a body from a wire and twist it instead of tilting it. A wire resists twist with a torque , where is the torsional constant in newton-metres per radian. This is already, with no approximation needed and no small-angle condition:
A balance wheel with on a wire with has . Notice does not appear: a torsion pendulum keeps the same time on the Moon.
Quick check
Why does the mass of a uniform rod not affect its period when it swings on a pivot at one end?
The center of oscillation
Every physical pendulum swings exactly like some simple pendulum. Compare the two formulas: and match when
This is called the equivalent length, and the point that far from the pivot, along the line through the center of mass, is the center of oscillation. Put all the mass there on a string and the timing is unchanged.
For a uniform rod of length pivoted a distance from its center, , so
For a rod pivoted from center: .
Worked example 4. A uniform rod of length has a hole drilled a distance from its center and hangs on a nail through the hole. Choose to make the period as short as possible, and find that period.
Shortest period means smallest , since . So minimise
Both terms fight each other. Pivot very close to the center and makes the restoring torque vanish, so blows up. Pivot at the very end and itself is large. Somewhere between is a minimum. Differentiate and set to zero:
At that the two terms are equal, so , and
If you would rather not use calculus, notice that and have a fixed product , and a sum with fixed product is smallest when the two are equal. That gives again.
When gravity is not g
In every derivation above, entered as "the acceleration of the uniform field pulling on the bob". Nothing required that field to be Earth's gravity as measured by someone standing still. In an accelerating frame, the bob feels gravity plus an inertial pull, and the pendulum responds to the effective gravity : the vector sum, taken in the frame of the support. Three cases cover nearly everything.
Straight-line acceleration upward. An elevator accelerating up at has , still pointing down. A pendulum with : , so . Faster, because the effective pull is stronger. Accelerating down, subtract; in free fall and the pendulum never returns at all.
Horizontal acceleration. In a car accelerating at on a level road, the two contributions are perpendicular, so , tilted backward from vertical. The pendulum hangs along that tilted direction and oscillates about it. With and : , so .
A cart sliding down a frictionless incline. The cart accelerates at down the slope. Add that inertial term to gravity and the components along the slope cancel exactly, leaving only the component perpendicular to the incline: , pointing perpendicular to the slope surface. For and : , and . The pendulum hangs perpendicular to the incline, not vertically.
There is one last thing a pendulum problem may ask that is not about period at all: how fast the bob is going at the bottom. That is energy, not oscillation. The bob rises a height when pulled aside, so and . For and : , so . No small-angle approximation is needed for that one. The next lesson takes that energy view and runs it through every oscillator, not just this one.
How to recognise the technique
A problem wants the pendulum machinery when something is pivoted and allowed to swing or twist under a restoring torque, and the question asks for a period, a frequency, a length, or .
Once you know that, the decision tree is short.
If all the mass is effectively at one distance from the pivot (a bob on a string, a small mass on a light rod) use , where reaches to the center of the bob.
If the swinging thing is an extended rigid body (a rod, a stick, a disk on a nail, a rod with something bolted to it) use . Write down first, from the pivot to the center of mass of the whole assembly, then build about the pivot with the parallel axis theorem, adding the pieces if there is more than one. If several bodies are joined, sum both and the terms, using for the combined center of mass.
If the restoring torque comes from a twisted wire or a spiral spring rather than from gravity, it is torsional: , and never appears. Two different bodies on the same wire give you , which is how you weigh a moment of inertia you cannot calculate.
If the support is accelerating, or sitting on an incline, or in an elevator, work out first and only then reach for a period formula. The pendulum hangs along , which may not be vertical.
And if the release angle is stated to three digits and is bigger than about , or the problem hands you a series in , the point of the problem is the failure of the small-angle approximation. Convert the angle to radians before you put it in the series.