A fingerprint made of light
Heat a tube of hydrogen gas until it glows, send the light through a prism, and you do not get a rainbow. You get four sharp coloured lines on a black background (red, blue-green, violet, deep violet) and nothing in between. Heat sodium instead and you get a different set of lines. Mercury, a third set. Every element has its own pattern, always the same, whether the gas is in a lab in Zurich or in a star ten thousand light years away.
That is a very strange fact. A hot filament gives off a smooth continuous spectrum. A hot gas of single atoms gives off a barcode. Something inside the atom can only give up energy in certain exact amounts, and those amounts are fixed properties of the element. The previous lesson on the photoelectric effect left you with a photon of energy as the unit in which light is emitted and absorbed. If the atom can only emit photons of particular energies, the atom itself must only have particular energies. This lesson works out what those energies are.
Why the classical atom cannot work
Start with the picture you would draw without knowing any of this. A proton of charge sits at the centre. An electron of mass and charge circles it at radius and speed . The only force is Coulomb attraction, and it points inward, so it is the centripetal force:
Here N·m²/C² is the Coulomb constant. Multiply both sides by and you get , so the kinetic energy is
The potential energy of two opposite charges a distance apart is , negative because you would have to do work to pull them apart. So the total energy is
Notice what fell out: , and . That relation holds for any inverse-square orbit: it is the same one you met for satellites in gravitation, and it is called the virial theorem. It will save you arithmetic later. If a problem hands you the total energy of a bound orbit, the potential energy is twice it and the kinetic energy is minus it.
So far nothing forbids any value of . Shrink the orbit and drops; every energy from down to is available, so the atom should emit a continuous spectrum. Worse, an accelerating charge radiates. A classical electron would spiral into the proton in about seconds. Classical physics does not predict the wrong spectrum for hydrogen. It predicts that hydrogen cannot exist.
Bohr's one extra rule
In 1913 Bohr added a single restriction and changed nothing else. The electron's orbital angular momentum, , cannot take any value. It comes in whole multiples of J·s:
The integer is the principal quantum number. Bohr had no justification for this in 1913; the reason arrives in the next lesson. Take it as a rule and follow the consequences.
You now have two equations, and , and two unknowns, and . Solve the second for and substitute into the first:
Multiply through by and divide by :
The constant is the Bohr radius, the size of the smallest allowed orbit. The radii go as : 0.0529 nm, 0.212 nm, 0.476 nm, 0.847 nm. The atom has a definite size, and that size comes out right: hydrogen really is about a tenth of a nanometre across.
Put back into and the beats the :
The dimensionless number is the fine-structure constant. In the ground state the electron moves at m/s, fast but only 0.7% of light speed, which is why ignoring relativity works as well as it does.
Three scalings carry most of the arithmetic in this topic: radius goes as , speed goes as , and energy goes as . The orbital period, being , therefore goes as .
The energy ladder
Substitute into :
The 13.6 eV is the Rydberg energy. The minus sign means bound: you must supply energy to get the electron out to , where . So the ladder reads eV, eV, eV, eV, eV, and so on, crowding up towards zero. The gaps shrink fast; above the levels are almost a continuum.
The first prediction is free. To ionise a ground-state hydrogen atom you must lift it from eV to , so the ionisation energy is 13.6 eV. That was a measured number in 1913 and the model reproduced it exactly.
For a hydrogen-like ion (one electron, nuclear charge ) replace by everywhere in the derivation. The radius picks up a and the energy picks up a :
So He⁺ () has a ground state at eV, and Li²⁺ () sits at eV in the ground state and eV at . Neutral helium, with two electrons, is not covered: the electrons repel each other and the derivation collapses.
Quick check
A ground-state hydrogen atom absorbs a photon of exactly 12.75 eV. Which level does it reach?
Lines are differences
A spectrometer never sees a level. It sees a photon, and a photon appears when the electron drops from an upper level to a lower level , carrying away exactly the gap:
Work in electronvolts and nanometres and you never need or separately, because eV·nm. Then with in eV and in nm. Memorise that one number and most of these problems become two lines of arithmetic.
Group the transitions by where they land. All the drops to form the Lyman series, in the ultraviolet. Drops to form the Balmer series, which is the one in the visible: those four coloured lines. Drops to are the Paschen series, in the infrared. Within a series, the longest wavelength comes from the smallest gap () and the shortest, called the series limit, comes from .
Absorption is the same arithmetic backwards. Cold hydrogen sitting in front of a white-light source swallows a photon only if its energy matches a gap exactly, so the transmitted light has dark lines in precisely the places where hot hydrogen glows. That is how you read the composition of a star.
Worked example 1: the red line
Hydrogen drops from to . Find the wavelength.
Write both levels first. eV. eV. The photon carries the difference:
Then nm. That is deep red, and it is the brightest line in a hydrogen tube. It has a name, H-alpha, and you will meet it again.
Worked example 2: do Balmer and Paschen overlap?
The Balmer series runs from its limit at 365 nm up to H-alpha at 656 nm. Does the Paschen series reach down into it?
The shortest Paschen wavelength is the largest Paschen gap, which is down to :
820 nm is longer than 656 nm, so the two series do not overlap: there is a clean gap between them. This is general: because the series limit of one series always sits at longer wavelength than the longest line of the series below it, the hydrogen spectrum sorts itself into separated blocks. That is what makes a barcode identifiable.
Quick check
A sample of hydrogen is excited to n = 4. How many distinct spectral lines can the sample produce as the atoms cascade down?
When the ladder is not quite 13.6
Three corrections turn up often enough that you should recognise them.
Nuclear charge. Already covered: multiply the whole ladder by and divide the radii by .
Reduced mass. The derivation assumed the nucleus stays put. It does not quite; both particles orbit their common centre of mass. The fix is to replace the electron mass by the reduced mass
where is the nuclear mass. Since the energy is proportional to the orbiting mass, every level scales by . For hydrogen , a 0.05% correction: small, but it is exactly what separates hydrogen's spectrum from deuterium's, and that difference is how deuterium was discovered.
A different orbiting particle. If a muon, 207 times heavier than an electron, replaces the electron, the ladder scales by 207: the ground state drops to eV, about 2.82 keV, and the orbit shrinks by the same factor of 207. Positronium, an electron bound to a positron, has , so and the ground state is eV.
The photon energy is a difference between two levels, never a level itself. A drop from to gives 1.89 eV, not 1.51 eV. Compute both energies, subtract, then convert with . The same trap runs backwards: an atom that absorbs a 12.09 eV photon from the ground state is not going to the "12.09 eV level", it is going to eV, which is .
Worked example 3: a helium line disguised as hydrogen
A He⁺ ion emits a photon of exactly the same wavelength as hydrogen's H-alpha line, and the transition ends on . What is the upper level?
From example 1, the photon energy is 1.889 eV. For He⁺, , so the prefactor is eV:
Divide: . Then
so and . The coincidence is not an accident. Because the He⁺ ladder is exactly four times hydrogen's, the He⁺ transition always lands on hydrogen's line. Doubling 3 and 2 gives 6 and 4, which is what you found. Astronomers had to untangle exactly this confusion in early stellar spectra.
Worked example 4: how hard must you hit an atom?
A ground-state hydrogen atom flies at a second ground-state hydrogen atom at rest. What is the minimum kinetic energy the incoming atom needs to excite one of them to ?
The naive answer is 10.2 eV, the gap. It is wrong, and the reason is momentum. The incoming atom carries momentum, and momentum is conserved, so the pair cannot end up at rest. Whatever kinetic energy they keep is unavailable for exciting anything.
The cheapest outcome is the one where they keep as little as possible, which is when both atoms end up moving together with the same velocity: a perfectly inelastic collision, the same idea you used in collisions. Let each atom have mass and let the incoming one have speed . Momentum gives the common final speed:
Initial kinetic energy is . Final kinetic energy is
which is exactly half of what you started with. So only half the incoming kinetic energy is ever available to be turned into internal energy. Setting that half equal to the 10.2 eV you need:
You have to hit it twice as hard as the gap suggests. The same bookkeeping runs in reverse when an atom emits: the atom recoils, so the photon gets slightly less than the full gap. The recoil energy is , and for a 10.2 eV photon off a hydrogen atom whose rest energy is 938 MeV that is eV. Utterly negligible here, but the same term is the whole story in nuclear gamma emission.
For very large the gap between neighbours is tiny and you can get it by differentiating. Since , a step of one level changes the energy by roughly . For that is eV, giving nm, about 4.5 cm: radio waves from a single atom. These giant Rydberg atoms are real and radio astronomers detect them.
What the model gets wrong
Keep the ladder, distrust the orbits. The energies are exactly what full quantum mechanics gives, and they are right. Everything else in the picture is scaffolding.
The model says nothing about how bright a line is, so it cannot tell you which transitions dominate. It gives no reason the orbits are stable despite the electron accelerating. It fails completely for any atom with more than one electron. And the crisp circular path itself is fiction: the electron has no trajectory, and in the true ground state its angular momentum is zero, not . Bohr's rule gets the right answer for the wrong reason, which happens more often in physics than anyone likes to admit.
Recognising a Bohr problem
Reach for this machinery when you see any of these:
- Integers attached to an atom. " to ", "the level", "the upper state". Quantum numbers in the problem statement mean the ladder.
- A wavelength or a photon energy together with an element. Emission lines, absorption lines, series names (Lyman, Balmer, Paschen), "series limit", "ionisation energy". Convert with nm and hunt for the pair of integers that fits.
- One electron and a nucleus of charge . He⁺, Li²⁺, Be³⁺, or "hydrogen-like". Scale by .
- A substituted particle. Muonic hydrogen, positronium, deuterium versus hydrogen, "the nucleus is not infinitely heavy". Reduced mass.
- A collision or a recoil around an excitation. Franck-Hertz tubes, atoms striking atoms, an atom emitting while free. Conserve momentum first, then spend what energy is left on the level gap.
The standard opening move is the same every time: write down and as numbers, subtract, and only then decide whether you need a wavelength, a speed, or a radius. Almost every mistake in this topic comes from skipping straight to a formula for without first writing the two levels.
Bohr's rule was a guess with nothing behind it. Ten years later de Broglie supplied the reason, and it turned out that is just the statement that a wave has to fit around the circle a whole number of times. That is next.